Self-determination
The right of self-determination for all peoples was first enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. It has however been the subject of extensive debate and controversy. Both the content of the right as well as who can assert it continue to evolve in international law.
According to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (the ICCPR), ‘[a]ll peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.'[i] The right to self-determination also has its economic content which gives the peoples the right to freely ‘dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic cooperation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law.'[ii] The phrase ‘all peoples’ – instead of ‘everyone’- attached to the right to self-determination indicates that the right to self-determination is a collective right; that is, only a ‘people’, not an individual, can exercise the right.
Initially conceived, the right to self-determination belonged to the population, or people, of a fixed territorial entity, specifically peoples oppressed by a colonial power. The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice emphasise the connection between the right to self-determination and peoples of colonised territories. In this context, the right to self-determination is “externally” exercised by secession from a colonial power to form a new state. The right of colonial peoples to external self-determination is well established in international law.
More recently, it has been postulated that the right to self-determination can be exercised ‘internally’ as well.[iii] Internal self-determination allows a people broader control over their political, economic, social and cultural development, while stopping short of secession. The development of a new conception of ‘peoples’ has evolved with the development of the idea of internal self-determination. In this context, the definition of ‘peoples’ is not only limited to the population of a fixed territorial entity but also encompasses indigenous groups and potentially some minorities. Although there is no fully accepted definition of peoples, references are often made to a definition proposed by UN Special Rapporteur Martínez Cobo in his study on discrimination against indigenous populations:
‘Indigenous communities, peoples and nations are those which, having a historical continuity with pre-invasion and pre-colonial societies that developed on their territories, consider themselves distinct from other sectors of the societies now prevailing in those territories, or parts of them. They form at present non-dominant sectors of society and are determined to preserve, develop and transmit to future generations their ancestral territories, and their ethnic identity, as the basis of their continued existence as peoples, in accordance with their own cultural patterns, social institutions and legal systems.'[iv]
Instruments protecting the right to self-determination
International instruments:
- Article 1(2), Charter of the United Nations
- Articles 1 and 12, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- Article 1(1), International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights
- Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
- General Recommendation No.21 on Right to Self-Determination, Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
- Article 29, Convention on the Rights of the Child
- Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide General Comment No.12 on Self-Determination, Human Rights Committee
- Article II, Resolution 260A(III) on the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, General Assembly
- ILO Convention concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries, No. 169
- Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation Among States
- Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples
- Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities
- Resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’, UN General Assembly
Regional instruments:
- Article 20(1), African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights
Relevant jurisprudence
International cases:
- Kalevi Paadar et al. v Finland, Human Rights Committee, 2011
- Poma Poma v Peru, Human Rights Committee, 2006
- Gillot v France, Human Rights Committee, 2002
- Länsman (Jouni) et al. (2) v Finland, Human Rights Committee, 2001
- Diergaardt et al v Namibia, Human Rights Committee, 2000
- Howard v Canada, Human Rights Committee, 1999
- Äärelä and Näkkäläjärvi v Finland, Human Rights Committee, 1997
- Portugal v Australia (the East Timor case), International Court of Justice, 1995
- Mahukia et al v New Zealand, Human Rights Committee, 1993
- Lubicon Lake Band v Canada (the Ominayak case), Human Rights Committee, 1990
- B. et al. v Italy, Human Rights Committee, 1990
- P. et al. v Colombia, Human Rights Committee, 1988
- L. et al. v Canada, Human Rights Committee, 1989
- Western Sahara Case, International Court of Justice, 1975
- Legal consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding with Security Council Resolution 276 (the Namibia case), International Court of Justice, 1970
Regional cases:
- Gunme and Others v Cameron, African Commission of Human and People’s Rights, 2009
References
[1] The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature December 16, 1966, Art. 1 (1), 999 UNTS 171.
[2] Id., Art. 1 (2).
[3] See, for instance, General Recommendation No. 21, Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, para. 4, 23/08/1996.
[4] Jose R. Martinez Cobo, Study of the Problem of Discrimination Against Indigenous Populations, Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and the Protection of Minorities, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1986/7/Add.4 (1986).
Photo: Maasai in Tanzania. Credit: Minority Rights Group.
Share this content
Related content
- Belize: Advocating Maya people’s rights to land
- Bosnia and Herzegovina: Bosniak barred from running for Presidency
- Bosnia and Herzegovina: Ensuring the political participation of minorities
- Botswana: Tribal recognition and equality for the Wayeyi
- Burundi: Protecting Batwa land rights
- Chagos Islands: The Right of Return for the Chagossians
- Chile: Mapuche and the right to non-discrimination and equality
- Democratic Republic of Congo: Protecting Batwa land rights
- African Commission of Human and Peoples’ Rights v Kenya (the ‘Ogiek case’)
- Mauritania: Challenging slavery of Haratine Women and Children
- The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Issues Landmark Judgment in Indigenous Rights Case
- Working together to eradicate statelessness in the Dominican Republic
- “Land grabbing” in Africa: An emerging legal framework highlights a lack of accountability for the UK’s role in the violation of land rights
- Social media: the new frontline in the fight against hate speech
- European Court of Human Rights upholds the ban on Hungarian Guard
- The ICC at 10 Years: Crises of Cooperation, Capacity and Legitimacy
- UK Parliamentary Recognition of Kurdish Genocide in Iraq: What This Means for Minority Groups Today
- Part 1: How to Skin a Porcupine
- Privatization of court interpreting hinders access to justice for non-English speakers in the UK
- London play highlights Chagossians’ plight
- Tunisia: achieving equality through legal means and lawyers’ support
- Preventing evictions from the Mau Forest of Kenya
- Exposing a slave society
- MRG dismayed by recent court decisions concerning slavery in Mauritania
- Kenyan government Task Force to implement African Court’s Ogiek judgment deeply flawed, MRG and OPDP say
- Minority Rights Group International Legal Director highly commended in prestigious law awards
- Compulsory purchase of Seven Sisters market vital to culture of London’s Latin American community, should not go ahead, says MRG
- African Court releases unanimous decision of judges on Ogiek land case – full judgment coming soon
- Mauritanie: La décision de l’organe Africain sur les Droits de l’Enfant de statuer sur une affaire d’esclavage représente une « lueur d’espoir », disent les organisations de lutte contre l’esclavage
- Međunarodna grupa za prava manjina (MRG) ukazuje na nepostupanje Bosne i Hercegovine po presudi protiv diskriminacije donešene od strane najvišeg Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
- MRG calls out Bosnia for failing to comply with discrimination ruling from Europe’s highest court
- Srebrenica genocide survivor wins challenge in Europe’s top human rights court against ban on running for high office
- MRG applauds government on recognition of Wayeyi tribe in Botswana
- Bosnia and Herzegovina: Supporting minority victims of discrimination accessing their human rights
- Endorois Welfare Council legal and capacity-building project evaluation
- Combating Discrimination and Promoting Minority Rights in Turkey
- Legal Cases programme
- Article 13 project: Mobilising Communities, Advocates and Lawyers to Challenge Racial and Other Discrimination in an Expanding Europe
- Equality and justice on the sidelines: Comparative report on discrimination against Roma and their access to justice in Slovakia and Slovenia
- In the name of security – Human rights violations under Iran’s national security laws
- Guidance: Exhausting domestic remedies under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights
- Minority Rights in the Russian Federation – Legal Framework Review
- Collateral Damage of the Dayton Peace Agreement: Discrimination Against Minorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Twenty Years On
- Minority groups and litigation: A review of developments in international and regional jurisprudence
- Constitutional Law and Minorities