Please note that on our website we use cookies to enhance your experience, and for analytics purposes. To learn more about our cookies, please read our privacy policy. By clicking ‘Allow cookies’, you agree to our use of cookies. By clicking ‘Decline’, you don’t agree to our Privacy Policy.

No translations available

Kachin in Myanmar

  • Profile

    The Kachin encompass a number of ethnic groups speaking almost a dozen distinct languages belonging to the Tibeto-Burman linguistic family who inhabit the same region in the northern part of Burma on the border with China, mainly in Kachin State. Strictly speaking, these languages are not necessarily closely related, and the term Kachin at times is used to refer specifically to the largest of the groups (the Kachin or Jingpho/Jinghpaw) or to the whole grouping of Tibeto-Burman speaking minorities in the region, which include the Maru, Lisu, Lashu, etc.

    The exact Kachin population is unknown due to the absence of reliable census data in Burma for more than 60 years. Most estimates suggest there may in the vicinity of 1 million Kachin in the country. The Kachin, as well as the Chin, are one of Burma’s largest Christian minorities: though once again difficult to assess, it is generally thought that between two-thirds and 90 per cent of Kachin are Christians, with others following animist practices or Buddhists.

    Historical context

    It is generally thought that the Kachin gradually moved south from their ancestral land on the Tibetan plateau through Yunnan in southern China to arrive in the northern region of what would become Burma sometime during the fifteenth or sixteenth centuries, making the Kachin relative newcomers.

    Their position in this borderland part of South-East Asia meant that the Kachin were often outside of the sphere of influence of Burman kings. Their strength was such by the Third Anglo-Burmese War of 1885 that, while the British were taking Mandalay, the Kachin were getting ready to take advantage of the Burman kingdom’s weakness to attack and take over Mandalay themselves. Nevertheless, most Kachin areas were administered by the British as a part of the Frontier Administration rather than Burma proper. Kachin traditional chiefs (duwas) continued to hold sway in their areas under the British administration.

    The Kachin were one of the ethnic minorities which participated in and signed the Panglong Agreement of 1947, and as such they received in-principle approval for the creation of a separate Kachin State, which was reflected in the first constitution of newly independent Burma. For a time this was sufficient, and there was no immediate insurgency against the government of Burma.

    There were some tensions between ethnic Kachin and the Burman-controlled government, but in the main Kachin stayed outside of the ethnic insurgencies soon after independence. This was to be dramatically altered after the declaration of Buddhism as the religion of Burma in 1961, which was perceived as an affront by the mainly Christian Kachin, leading directly – with other grievances – to the creation of the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO) and its military wing, the Kachin Independent Army (KIA). The final straw seems to have been General Ne Win’s military coup in 1962, as the President-elect at the time was a Kachin, Sama Duwa Sinwa Nawng.

    The post-1962 period also saw an increased ‘Burmanization’ of the army and institutions of the state, and with it a stronger sense of ethnic Kachin being discriminated against and excluded by government authorities in areas such as employment and economic opportunities, all of which continued to fuel the insurgency in Kachin areas.

    Whereas the KIO initially was able to control much of Kachin State in the early years of the insurgency, this began to change after 1988 as the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) began to conclude ceasefire agreements with neighbouring groups, and subsequently redeployed and concentrated military forces against Kachin rebels. As a result, by 1994 the KIO decided to enter into a ceasefire with the junta, which allowed it some degree of local administrative control in pockets of Kachin State, though all of the land and natural resources remain under the authority of the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) government.

    After 1994 some economic projects were initiated in Kachin State and some degree of latitude granted by the SPDC to the KIO – at least initially – which began to permit the emergence of local Kachin NGOs and even the tentative involvement in the area of some international NGOs. However, in subsequent years, unsustainable and unaccountable logging and mining activities took their toll on the natural environment of Kachin State, with reports implicating Burma’s military junta in their exploitation. Military officials, for example, had given permits for gold-mining in the Hugawng Valley Tiger Reserve in northern Kachin State leading to the displacement of thousands of local inhabitants. These and other similar activities appeared to favour selected companies and individuals closely connected to the ruling regime, and at the same time have an ethnic component as ethnic Burmans were encouraged to work and settle in some of the areas where the mining and logging activities occur.

    The Burmese military presence also increased dramatically, from 26 battalions in 1994 to almost 50 in 2007, bringing at the same time an increase in the allegations of human rights violations and atrocities such as land confiscations (with little or no compensation), forced labour and sexual violence. The SPDC appeared to appoint ethnic Burmans to almost all administrative positions in towns such as Danai, leading to the virtual elimination of any use of the Kachin language in local affairs.

    In addition to the same type of violations of human rights experienced by many of the country’s ethnic minorities, Kachin appeared to be targeted specifically by Burmese authorities because of their Christian beliefs, with reports of community members being subjected to conversion activities and discriminatory treatment by authorities because of their religion, such as rewards if they convert to Buddhism or exemption from forced labour, lower prices for basic foodstuffs such as rice and greater educational opportunities. There were also claims of Kachin Christian parents being offered free schooling for their children at Buddhist monasteries, and of Burmese soldiers being encouraged by authorities to marry Kachin women to convert them to Buddhism.

    Current issues

    The situation in Kachin State has worsened since June 2011, when the 17-year ceasefire with Kachin Independence Army (KIA) was breached. Fighting has increased since then, including full-scale land and aerial assault on the ethnic rebel strongholds, killing civilians and forcing thousands from their homes.  Approximately 100,000 people remain displaced in Kachin and northern Shan State as a result of the fighting, with many struggling to access essential services in the wake of a blockage of humanitarian assistance by the government and military.

    Reports of abuses against civilians by the Myanmar army in Kachin State continued, including extrajudicial killings, rape and sexual abuse, torture, indiscriminate attacks on civilians and forced labour: both the government and ethnic armies have been accused of using civilians for forced labour and as human shields.

    The situation is complicated by the presence of natural resources, particularly jade, that the government is eager to exploit. Only a small proportion of the billions of dollars of jade sourced from the region, however, is accounted for. Struggles to maintain control of the resource by vested interests with links to the military have resulted in continued fighting in certain areas. In July 2016, the government announced that no new permits would be issued nor existing ones renewed until a regulatory legal framework is settled, a significant step to reform the industry.

    Updated August 2017

Related content

Reports and briefings

  • Our strategy

    We work with ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities, and indigenous peoples to secure their rights and promote understanding between communities.

  • Stories

    Discover the latest insights from our global network of staff, partners and allies.

  • Events

    Join us for insightful discussions at webinars, screenings, exhibitions and more.