African Commission of Human and Peoples’ Rights v Kenya (the ‘Ogiek case’)
The Ogiek, one of the last forest-dwelling hunter-gatherer communities, are among some of the most marginalized of all indigenous peoples and minorities in Kenya. Since time immemorial, they have lived in the Mau Forest in Kenya’s Rift Valley and in the forested areas around Mt Elgon, relying on these territories for food, shelter, identity and therefore their very survival. Since independence, and indeed prior to it, the Ogiek have been routinely subjected to arbitrary forced evictions from their ancestral land by their Government, without consultation or compensation. This has had a detrimental impact on the Ogiek’s pursuit of their traditional lifestyle, religious and cultural life, and access to natural resources on their land and, more generally, access to education, health services and justice.
In 2009, a case was lodged by OPDP and CEMIRIDE, on behalf of the Ogiek, before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the ‘African Commission’) against the Government of Kenya. The case alleges violations of the Ogiek’s rights to life, property, natural resources, development, religion, culture and non-discrimination under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
MRG became involved in the case in April 2010 and, after an extensive fact finding mission and community consultations, drafted and filed admissibility submissions before the African Commission in August 2010.
In 2012, the African Commission decided to refer the case to the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the ‘African Court’) as it demonstrated serious and mass human rights violations.
On 15 March 2013, the African Court issued a provisional measures order, requiring the Kenyan Government to (i) immediately reinstate the restrictions it had imposed on land transactions in the Mau Forest Complex, and (ii) refrain from any act/thing that would/might irreparably prejudice the main application, until the African Court gives its final decision in the case. The order was issued as the African Court considered that ‘there is a situation of extreme gravity and urgency, as well as a risk of irreparable harm to the [rights of the] Ogiek of the Mau Forest’.
This is one of the first cases brought originally by NGOs to have been referred to the African Court by the African Commission, and is the first case to have reached hearing stage. It is therefore creating both important procedural as well as legal precedent. It is also one of the African Court’s first ever cases, and the first to consider the rights of indigenous peoples.
On 27 and 28 November 2014, the African Court heard arguments from the African Commission legal team as well as two Ogiek witnesses, an expert witness, and an intervention by MRG on behalf of the original Complainants. MRG also supported 25 Ogiek to attend the hearing in person and supported a further 40 Ogiek to view the hearing live in Kenya via the live stream link. The case remains pending and we are hopeful for judgment by early 2017.
In the meantime, there have been continuing violations of the provisional measures order, with a violent eviction of approximately 1,000 Ogiek and police intimidation. In May 2017, the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination noted its concern in response to reports of ongoing forced evictions that were brought to the Committee’s attention. The Kenyan Government has also announced its plans for the Mau Forest Complex, which will soon become government land and its inhabitants relocated. MRG issued a firm statement at the March 2016 session of the United Nations Human Rights Council on this.
While awaiting the judgment, MRG continues to work with the Ogiek community to identify a common set of conservation standards by which they can request the land to be returned to them (pursuant to a successful African Court judgment or settlement), undertake a community mapping of Ogiek land, pursue international and national advocacy work (including a shadow report to Kenya’s Universal Periodic Review before the Human Rights Council in 2016) and provide capacity building training to the community through paralegal training.
- Case documents
- Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination: Concluding observations on the fifth to seventh periodic reports of Kenya
- CEMIRIDE, MRG and OPDP submission on admissibility in the Ogiek case to the African Commission
- MRG submission on the merits in the Ogiek case to the African Court
- Case Summary of the Ogiek case prepared by the African Court
- African Court Order of Provisional Measures in the Ogiek case
- MRG intervention at the hearing before the African Court
- Briefing papers and reports
- Advocacy at the African Commission and the United Nations
- MRG statement to the Human Rights Council for the adoption of the final report of the Universal Periodic Review of Kenya, 2015
- MRG statement calls the attention of the UN Human Rights Council on minorities in Yemen and Ogiek in Kenya, 2016
- OPDP statement to the fifty-seventh Ordinary Session of the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights, 2015
- Kenyan Civil Society Coalition submission to the Human Rights Council on Kenya’s second Universal Periodic Review, 2014
- MRG alternative report to the Human Rights Committee on the third periodic review of Kenya, 2012
- MRG letter to the UN Special Rapporteur, 2009
- MRG press releases
- MRG condemns violence against Kenya’s Ogiek, calls for full investigation
- African Court to hear Ogiek community lands rights case against the Kenyan government
- MRG deeply concerned about attacks on Ogiek activists in Kenya and calls for immediate investigation of incidents of harassment
- African court issues historic ruling protecting rights of Kenya’s Ogiek community
- MRG condemns targeted attacks on Ogiek activists
- The Ogiek: Forgotten victims of Kenya’s election violence