There are 205,009 Mapuche in Argentina (2010 Census). Since the late-nineteenth century, the unity of the Mapuche nation has been divided by the international boundary with Chile: Argentina is the puel mapu (the eastern land); Chile is the ngulu mapu (the western land). Free access across this frontier is still an important issue of debate today.
Many anthropological and historical studies assert that the Mapuche of Argentina originally came from Chile in the eighteenth century (referred to as the ‘Araucanization of the Pampas’). This has recently been contested, but it means that some Argentinians can question the ‘Argentine-ness’ of the Mapuche.
Mapuche people live all over Argentina (in the provinces of Buenos Aires, La Pampa, Chabut, Santa Cruz, Río Negro and Neuquén, as well as in many cities of other provinces) but the majority lives in Neuquén and Río Negro. It is here that the most consequential Mapuche political organizations have emerged.
Today Argentine Mapuche have many of their own organizations, such as the Coordinadora de Organizaciones Mapuches (COM) and Taiñ Kiñegetuam, ‘to return to being one’, in which women, who traditionally play a major role in Mapuche ritual, are prominent.
Many Mapuche were killed or forced to flee their communities in the late nineteenth century during the military campaigns led by President Julio Roca (known as the ‘Conquest of the Desert’, 1879). Since then they have lived scattered throughout Argentina, although – as noted above – they mainly live in the provinces of Neuquén and Río Negro.
In Northern Patagonia the state granted official acknowledgement of Mapuche communities’ ownership of rural lands as early as the 1960s, but the lack of legal security, the land’s poor quality, and the communities’ geographic isolation caused many Mapuche to migrate to other regions. Many went to the cities to find work.
Historically, there was little political mobilization among Argentine Mapuche (i.e., organization beyond the community). The first non-traditional Mapuche organizations were formed in the 1970s in the provinces of Neuquén and Rio Negro; the movement became more significant in the mid-1980s during Argentina’s transition to democracy.
In the early 1990s, the Coordinadora de Organizaciones Mapuches (COM) was created with the purpose of uniting and representing rural and urban Mapuche organizations. COM pledged itself to autonomy and self-determination, transforming demands for land into demands for a territory; it was also active in the implementation of educational programmes in the Mapuche language.
Conflict between the Mapuche nation and the state broke out openly in 1995, over indigenous lands in the Pulmari region. Local Mapuche communities were finding it difficult to survive because the Pulmari Interstate Corporation, which controlled the national park, prohibited hunting and gathering and restricted Mapuche people’s movement through the territory. In protest against such restrictions, as well as threats of relocation, several communities occupied the lands; they were forcibly evicted.
Since the mid-1990s, Mapuche mobilisation in Argentina has had an important impact on political debates, particularly at a local/provincial level. The federal government has invested in intercultural/bilingual education centres in Neuquén, as a result of the efforts of the provincial government and campaigns led by Mapuche organizations in the region. In 1997 the state launched the project ‘Mejoramiento de la Calidad de la Educación de los Pueblos Aborigenes’, as part of the National Program for Primary Schools, and COM has managed to set up several Mapuzungun workshops in the provinces of Neuquén and Río Negro.
In July 2008 Mapuche in the southern regions of Chile took steps to formally register a new political party. One of the main goals was to achieve Mapuche self-government and to recreate what they call Wallmapu (Mapuche land) in southern Chile and Argentina where most Mapuche are still concentrated.
The Argentine state has updated its legislation on indigenous rights in accordance with international developments, but reports by local indigenous groups and international human rights organizations suggest that the law is rarely translated into practice (particularly when this clashes with private interests and the state’s economic agenda).
Few Mapuche communities have the proper deeds for collective land ownership, and lands described as ‘reservations’ tend to be considered fiscal lands. This has meant that mining, oil and gas developments have been able to take place despite the protests of local communities; the latter complain that provincial authorities, responsible for granting the concessions, do not consider these projects’ impacts on local people. The conflict over land ownership continues to be a major problem today, as do the resource extraction issues.
Land titling is at the root of the problem. For example, according to the Argentinean Constitution, indigenous Mapuche are the legitimate owners of the lands in Patagonia but the majority of Mapuche in Patagonia do not hold legal title to lands inhabited by their pre-colonial ancestors, and this is now regarded as ‘publicly-owned property’. As a result large parcels of indigenous land are frequently sold off to the highest bidder, thus contributing to the underlying conditions for land ownership disputes in that region.
The most controversial saga has involved Benetton Group SA which bought a large amount of land in the Chabut region from the Argentine state several years ago. In 2004 a Mapuche couple occupied 300 hectares of land (officially owned by Benetton, but which they believed was rightfully theirs), and they were removed. This led to a series to high profile protest campaigns and in November 2005 Benetton offered to hand over 7,500 hectares to the province. Mapuche organizations rejected the donation: they claimed Benetton could not donate what it did not rightfully own and that 7,500 hectares was a small amount of land compared to the 900,000 hectares under dispute.
Alarming episodes of violence against Mapuche in Patagonia took place between 2016 and 2018: as mentioned above, Benetton controls large areas of land in Chubut, resulting in clashes with tribal communities living in Cushamen. Mapuche leader Facundo Jones Huala joined the Pu Lof resistance movement in 2016. After blocking a railway and the national route 40 in November 2017, the inhabitants of Cushamen were brutally evicted by police officers in January 2017. Jones Huala was accused of being a terrorist and extradited to Chile in 2018, where he was sentenced to nine years in prison on charges of arson. In January 2022, a Chilean appeals court conditionally released Jones Huala, although this was later overturned by the country’s Supreme Court.
In August 2018, security forces evicted Mapuche inhabitants from lands owned by Benetton. In this episode, Argentine activist Santiago Maldonado was missing for 77 days and found dead in unclear circumstances. On the day of Maldonado’s burial, members of the Lakfen Winkul community in Rio Negro were evicted, with officers killing a 22-year-old Mapuche man, Rafael Nahuel. The Ministry for Security stated that Rafael died in a confrontation with the police and had been involved in an attack on police officers, though subsequent investigations cast doubt on the official account.
There has been some important progress made in the area of bilingual/intercultural education, with Mapuche communities and organizations taking an increasingly active role in the methodology and content of teaching. In areas that attract many foreign travellers, such as Bariloche and San Martin, local Mapuche have been able to turn the growing interest in eco-friendly tourism to their advantage, running tours, arranging ‘traditional’ accommodation and meals, selling their art and so forth. There have also been many significant advances with regards to uniting Argentine and Chilean Mapuche organizations. Mapuche organizations currently play an important role in debates about Mapuche political prisoners in Chile.
Updated September 2022
We stand up for minority and indigenous rights. Find out howLeart more about us
No related content found.